problem is they will need 51 to dismiss. We have Mckulski, Collins, and other RINOS that just might vote against dismissal.
-
-
-
I don't think McConnell makes that public play if he doesn't know he has the votes.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I can hear the preemptive liberal screeching from here and it's:pic.twitter.com/BEeCpDh29F
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why? Why not play their game and bring in witnesses? Will this not play well with public?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I disagree. I want to hear sworn testimony from Schiff, Ciamarello, and Hunter Biden!
-
Still can under regular committee hearings
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Totally agree. Don't legitimize the
#Shampeachment@ScottAdamsSaysThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd rather have the House Dems vote for it and give more chance they'll be voted out of office in November.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do it ... McConnell. Do it !

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Music to my ears. End the charade STAT
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.