c:/user/deepstate_DNC_AtlanticConcil>>>http://impeachmentteam.py if values a b c else a = "if" b = "I feel" c = "I heard" else bool (a b c) else "if" = evidence "I feel" = evidence "I heard" = evidence else bool (a b c) = true else impeach "orangeman bad" = true end.
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Based upon absence of absence of evidence of absence, I think the thing that is absent is... My understanding!
#TotallyLostThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is the question now isn't it. Also the house judiciary committee must discover "If it is the evidence of evidence?".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be read while drinking absinthe
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absence of evidence is not "proof" of anything. Nothing only describes what's lacking.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People who bounce when they talk like Noah Feldman deserve more jail time than Roger Stone
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course, using the current Congressional D definition of “evidence” (that is, a fact or claim “consistent” with what they allege rather than one that actually explicitly supports it), absence of evidence is evidence of absence.this is an example of how they do violence to words
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.