Actually not. It probably would have been a hung jury, or not guilty again. There still would have been a Mark Furman problem. The jury would still have believed that he planted that glove.. and the gloves would still not fit.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He was guilty The scene processing was atrocious and the defense experts lied in court
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That would be double jeopardy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What dna evidence was there?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And how much more racist everyone is
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There WAS overwhelming DNA evidence!!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not in that jury pool
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They should have looked at his Son. Legit psycho. OJ didnt have any marks on his body and they said Goldman fought off the attacker as long as he could. Oj would have been bruised at least. Goldman was a black belt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
no his son would have been outed !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
DNA proves OJ was at the scene but his son was the murderer.
-
It was Glen Rogers
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.