In a column in the Washington Post one of Roger Stone’s DC jurors essentially admits he did not pay attention to defense argumentshttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/i-was-a-juror-in-roger-stones-trial-we-took-his-rights-seriously/2019/11/22/234d7df0-0d46-11ea-97ac-a7ccc8dd1ebc_story.html …
-
-
. A DC jury and an Obama judge. Stone never had a chance. Might as well have been tried in a zoo by kangaroos. .pic.twitter.com/kqmVvMjbxM
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This alone should be grounds for a mistrial...
-
Sorry, appeal...Trial is over...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would like to have read the article but WaPo wanted me to pay them $1 to continue. That's entirely too much for their level of journalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
If this article was written by
@washingtonpost reporter ABOUT the trial, would it have been any different?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about muller , shift , ant struck and page the lovers with a back up plan they all lied and miss spoke they are not being charged ? Why not !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's DC just as sick as Hollywood
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Closing arguments are not evidence. That is one of the instructions they judge read to the jury. Nothing at all the lawyers say is evidence. Do you not really know this or are you just being obtuse to be right/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.