Vindman was clearly the real trigger-man, but for whatever reason he or someone else decided it would be better to outsource the "whistleblowing" task to someone else, presumably to allow him to make a grand entrance into the arena, dress-blues and all that.
-
-
-
Vindman is subject to UCMJ prosecution if he mishandled classified info. The leaker of record likely is authorized access a civilian & less likely to be prosecuted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, because Vindman did not report the alleged event. Vindman could be a whistleblower had he filed a report. However, Vindman may have broken laws if he did not have permission to share information with the Whistleblower.
-
I doubt Vindman as an active duty Army officer qualifies as a WB under the IC law.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No. It makes him a leaker.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I said that from the moment Vindman testified. He's the "whistleblower" aka leaker. Because Schiff conspired with Eric and got caught, they had to call Vindman. Manufactured from the start.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They are hiding what Vindman did because he could get court martialed
#Impeachment#Vindman#USMCJThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Real doesn't seem applicable to either.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.