The “headline reading informed” are sheep..so much misinformation. Terrible and scary to see
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From what I saw in the documentary, the
#TexasParoleBoard on the@FreeRodneyReed Case is riddled with new#DNA evidence & revisiting police officer(1996)#JimmyFennel who lawyered up with RobertPhillips@CityofBastropTX#BryceBenjet@innocence . This IS FAIR Jack.@theinterceptThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The belt will almost certainly have no DNA, and this is what Team Reed expects: Obfuscation. If a lawyer came up with the Secret Affair fable, his assets & future earnings should go to the Stites family.
-
The chances are with touch DNA it will have multiple DNA on it. Here's, Reed's, the fiancee, and others as it has been contaminated by direct handling. It will prove nothing.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Jack. I before you jumped in asked Gregg Abbott to make sure that all the DNA they said had not been run was. I think it's important for all to have clear sense of this picture.
-
The only DNA not run was on the belt, which because the case resulted in a conviction and this being the early 90's meant that evidence was not handled with gloves anymore. Ergo is now contaminated.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The murderer of a small woman is unlikely to have bled on the belt he took from her and strangled her with. Asking to test it now is meant to make supporters of trial by jury seem unreasonable to the uninformed.
End of conversation
-
-
-
He’s a single Congressman not a modern day Equilizer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hmmm... What Would No Name Do?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.