Several scholars and more than a few court rulings would seem to be at odds with "Constitutional Cuomo"
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This is what you get when your reading history consists of Mad Magazine & Little LULU comics! The then STATES would never have agreed to joined the Union ( 1789) unless the individual was guaranteed a self armed Amendment! The British taught them that lesson!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Quomo's statement is in direct opposition to the written words in the Bill of Rights! The Federalist Papers, a written explaination of the how & why of the Bill of Right is the back up for the 2A amendment! There's no mystery here, just ignorance!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Apparently they didn't fully read it; Scalia gave probably the most basic description as to the purpose of the Bill of Rights - to protect natural rights against regulation from the state (not rights granted by the state). Protecting yourself and property is a natural right...
-
Also, something that requires the resources from another person
is
not
a
human
right 
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
