Sounds right to me
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Or if they verbal say they're not happy with the investigation in private or public.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I love it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My take: its unpatriotic to blur the line between 1. foreign spies that DID meddle in our election 2. lawful court-ordered surveillance by the
@FBI to protect our elections Jack’s argument above all is unchristlike & elevating the arguments of foreign spiespic.twitter.com/BBAWMEE0iq
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Under Weissman's interpretation, mere expressions of disagreement about an investigation constitute obstruction.
-
By the
@GOP definition of exoneration Czar Alexander is exonerated of trying to annex North America in 1821? Kaiser Wilhelm is exonerated of the 1917 Zimmerman Telegram? Nikita Khrushchev is exonerated of trying to put missiles in Cuba in 1962? Cruel intentions: not cruel?pic.twitter.com/TqsBUQEdY6 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds perfectly fine to me. Use their logic against them. Watch ‘em squirm.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
- 10 more replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.