NOTE: Is this the 302 of Flynn’s interview or a 302 of Strzok being interviewed after the fact? Something isn’t adding up here
-
-
Show this thread
-
The original was ordered. What is this?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@POTUS@realDonaldTrump needs to declassify and unredact everything in this Russia hoax case.... Who cares if the@FBI has a problem with it? They're the ones that got us into this mess to begin with. -
Also, someone please explain to me the logic behind a DOJ attorney getting taxpayer money to represent
@Comey who is no longer a DOJ employee. Does that make sense to anyone else? Telling him not to answer certain questions... I don't get it. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@seanmdav reports that it’s a 302 of an interview of Struck filed 6 months later, not an original 302 of the Flynn interview. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Now show us the original....Ohh wait. That one has probably been destroyed because it didn’t contain substantive info. This whole thing is a farce.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why is Mueller so afraid? So many blacked out sections indicate improper prosecution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I think they missed a spot... I still see a few words.

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.