He’s not going to do an EO. But this sure is a speedy way of getting it in front of the court. ie: How do you get congress to start talking about something they refuse to talk about?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe...but I bet the SC will weigh in. It's all good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why do people choose to give birth here in the USA if we're racist and stuff? Canada has a lot of room. And they love terrorist fighters. They speak English. Escort the
#CaravanaMigrante there.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
And congress should clarify this, not by executive order
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Subject to" in this context means "[bound by] the jurisdiction thereof" which is why the second part of the amendment states "and of the State wherein they RESIDE". Your residence binds your jurisdiction and determines your State laws.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If Congress won't, the States can. It might be interesting to see Trump lead the charge for an Article V convention.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As conservatives we need to accept the text of the 14th Amendment. Congress needs to change the laws to prevent illegal entry, and fund the wall. They should also rework the asylum laws to prevent liberal lawyers from abusing them. The President can EO in all those areas.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That would require the Congress to take an actual position
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.