They have to redact a good bit. No need to drag more people's names all around the USA so people can try to rip their names and credibility apart as well. Nothing would have been good enough though, let's be honest. She could recant and 0 Democrats will vote him in.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dems only call for the releasing of documents when it suits them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you listen closely you can almost hear the Dimm's shooting themselves in the foot.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s hilarious because they really believe this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Every attorney in America who has a client involved in any fbi investigation would love to dictate WHO the agents speak to. That’s now how it works nor should we want it to work that way
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.Please don't bring the Witnesses into it; we had nothing to do with it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Problem is Obama and Leahy created this rule and if you're worried about getting people to speak to FBI their raw interview notes need to be private. Difi and Dems have completely destroyed the process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The door is closing behind you right now for any Bill Clinton era whataboutism to continue. People under 40 are looking forward to you shutting your yapper once and for all on the Boomer era. I hope Kavanugh was worth your juicy talking points that are now DOA. Good riddance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.