Just because Lanny Davis is a lyin’ scam artist doesn’t mean he was the only source on CNN’s Michael Cohen story - most likely that’s why they aren’t pulling it. The story could still have truth to it
-
-
How can it be found out that an individual was used as an anonymous source for a story and that he was also quoted in the story as not being able to comment - and that not be worthy of a retraction or apology from the news organization once exposed?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doubling down...WoW!!??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I trust you more than cnn.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
This was my first thought as well. Hoping it's not true though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
CNN has lied so much to us for the past 2 years, so WHY are we to believe anything they say? It is banned in our home. It is like watching the Jerry Springer Show.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lanny Davis leaked the false story to others who then became sources themselves. *Circular reporting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It doesn’t matter as he’s already testified under oath that Trump didn’t know about the meeting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.