Sure, background checks must be enforced
-
-
Replying to @JackPosobiec
Feel it's a pragmatic approach. Do you feel that current checks are enough? Is something being missed in that Parkland etc can happen?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drjanaway
Agreed, Parkland officials missed everything in that case. Looks like Santa Fe too
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @JackPosobiec
So what can be improved? And do you agree that AR15s and other such high rate weaponry is superfluous for home defense and recreation? Would it not be better to prioritise police?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @drjanaway
As far as I know it was semi-automatic. Full auto is already banned
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JackPosobiec
That's reassuring. Should the line be pushed further to banning semi automatics, or atleast further restriction? Im sure we can all agree that all risk should be minimised where feasible?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @drjanaway
That would be pretty tough to accomplish since the vast majority of privately owned weapons in the United States are semi-automatic
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @JackPosobiec
Certainly presents a problem. But likely worth the time? I guess we need to understand more comprehensively why people want them?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
As long as it’s not for committing crimes it’s really their own business
-
-
Replying to @JackPosobiec
How do you differentiate between likelihood of criminal activity and private use? Aside from background checks, how can you be sure?
11 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.