If the SC had upheld the ruling it would have changed from Narrow to Landmark in the headline.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think most people are smart enough to know what narrow in legal scope means. It's legal precedent, not a basketball score.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A 9-0 decision could be narrow. Correctly noting that the decision is focus on this one case and doesn't address larger issue of discrimination isn't biased. It's the truth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The people who call 7-2 narrow are probably the same people who still think 232 beats 306.pic.twitter.com/BxXRqfUZ5q
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The court ruled that the commission in Colorado didn’t give proper credence to the baker. The Supreme Court’s decision is no way said he could or could not discriminate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The court didn't decide that he could discriminate in the name of religious freedom. The court ruled the Colorado commission didn't listen to him enough. There's quite a big difference there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@BillHemmer did the same thing when he said it was a razor then ruling. That’s not a razor anything.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The opinion is now out there and can be read.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.