Sources shared a draft of the bill, which has not yet been introduced. It also states that the unions and tech companies “may additionally” agree "not disparage, defame, sully or compromise the goodwill, name, brand, or reputation of the network company” and vice versa.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Me and
@clauirizarry wrote about the broad strokes of this proposal a couple of days ago.https://www.thecity.nyc/work/2021/5/19/22444743/gig-workers-unionize-in-new-york-but-still-not-employees …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This bill sounds like
for the workers. -
WhELl AkShUlLy YoU sEe WoRkErS wOuLd BenIfIt fRoM lOw BarGaInInG pOwEr BeCaUsE pRoDuCtiVitY pRofIT TriCkLeS dOwNpic.twitter.com/BcpXlYcEFO
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So you can form a union but *only* if you agree to give up all your leverage
-
It’s true for a huge number of unions under Taylor’s Law. Most states have laws like this sadly, which have totally defanged unions.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Shame on legislators that consult big business on policy without equal rep for the workers. Grrr
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry, I'm confused, could you explain how the fuck that works
-
It doesn't work at all
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds like another attempt at a Prop 22 in New York. Ask the Cali gig drivers how that's going over here. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/e2-80-98a-slap-in-the-face-e2-80-99-california-uber-and-lyft-drivers-criticize-pay-cuts-under-prop-22/ar-BB1gMIVz …
-
They wanted to eat shit and now that they're eating shit they're complaining about it
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.