True. But when Funimation said they do not support harassment, and then people started to brigade and harass, then they cannot claim harassment when people start to question and counter their narrative.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
You are making two dangerous assumptions: 1) the victims are being truthful and 2) what they were victims of rises to sexual harassment (or assault, if you’re Ron). You assume their truth without Vic having had a chance to face his accusers. Why do you feel that’s fair and just?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
I’d say his refraining from Twitter is a plus, not a minus. And the only things he was allowed to answer in the investigation were the jellybean incident, an event he denied, and a consensual kiss. Is that fireable? If not, he was fired for something he didn’t get to respond to.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No but the lawsuit is public knowledge and that’s all that it cites. If there’s more then either 1) Vic lied to his lawyers, which is unwise and unlikely 2) discovery will uncover additional reasons for his firing and my assertion will be proven correct
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.