But what if those ten are “hey he was kind of weird?” If that’s the highest bar they can pass, is that worth ruining a man’s livelihood? I feel like there’s a lot of real world context being lost here because we’re on Twitter - on both sides. It’s frightening.
I’d say his refraining from Twitter is a plus, not a minus. And the only things he was allowed to answer in the investigation were the jellybean incident, an event he denied, and a consensual kiss. Is that fireable? If not, he was fired for something he didn’t get to respond to.
-
-
No but the lawsuit is public knowledge and that’s all that it cites. If there’s more then either 1) Vic lied to his lawyers, which is unwise and unlikely 2) discovery will uncover additional reasons for his firing and my assertion will be proven correct
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.