Possibly, but here’s history there too. The relegation of public hosing to certain areas had the support of minority politicians, because it preserved their voting base. Great book on this very topic:https://www.amazon.com/American-Project-Rise-Modern-Ghetto/dp/0674008308 …
-
-
That is totally believable, and it made sense when the minority voting base was smaller and white ppl were more hostile. As diversity becomes more mainstream as required by demographics, newer minority politicians will be more open to broader coalitions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ersatzverite @J_RtheWriter and
Although there is a terrible alternative that I worry about, where the definition of "white" keeps on expanding until the only non "white" people are black people.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
To me that’s not the alternative, that’s the reality. Back and black Hispanics will continue to be junior partners in the Dem coalition and ignored/targeted by the GOP. And white Hispanics and Asians will assimilate into the mainstream
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Could be. I'm hoping not. I think the Rs not adopting that position makes it less likely to happen -- but a big loss may change things if Trump's revealing of their character hasn't killed Rs reputation w/ hispanics and asians.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not about winning the group. Enough Asians and Hispanics already identify as Rs. Blacks the only group that decided to put all our eggs in one basket. Valid reasons but the result is that progressive policies tend to come with a healthy measure of “we know what’s best for you”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's fair, and there are a lot of Hispanics who seem pretty resistant to abandoning the Rs right now. Not sure if they are attracting new Hispanics and Asians.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ersatzverite @J_RtheWriter and
I actually think ppl are getting better at realizing that attaching strings to aid is counterproductive. I'm generally pro-just redistribute cash and let ppl decide except for HC where there are major information asymmetries.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Color me skeptical. If you build a bunch of public housing or put more money in pubic schools but don’t dismantle the regulations that allow the white and wealthy to game the system, then you haven’t changed the underlying structures that fuel inequality
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Which is why housing experts aren't only in favor of public housing. Public schooling is a bit different. Although, straight up redistribution may help by giving poor families more resources and family engagement is prob the most impt determinant in educational outcomes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Can’t separate education from housing. Part of the creation of ghettoes was the creation of restrictive school zoning Have been efforts to reverse this as cities become more popular but public system still ripe for gaming
-
-
Housing is an important part of the long-term fix, although ppl seem to also be self-segregating (at least politically). Providing resources is part of the near term fix and will hopefully produce more mixed communities in the long run.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.