Which may be an argument about the limits of liberal Utopianism.
-
-
Arguing the limits of liberal Utopianism has been my whole point Just because you’ve designed the perfect plan on paper, doesn’t mean it’s going to weather the economic and political realities of the world. You should be constantly updating your priors based on results
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The political environment in the US is particularly toxic to getting gov't to do certain types of things, which is why handing out money is often a good default measure. That being said, it doesn't have to be that way, and having the gov't succeed more pushes against that view.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think that’s an understatement. There is a history of racism and white supremacy that compromises the government’s ability to deliver public services equally and efficiently And it doesn’t get addressed enough because it doesn’t map well into existing left-right politics
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @ersatzverite and
You can’t talk about housing and education without noting that the existing structures are there to allow certain people to retreat into enclaves explicitly designed to limit those people’s interactions with other people not wealthy enough or white enough to be there
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
That also might be why a majority minority city did public housing better than more white dominant regions.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Possibly, but here’s history there too. The relegation of public hosing to certain areas had the support of minority politicians, because it preserved their voting base. Great book on this very topic:https://www.amazon.com/American-Project-Rise-Modern-Ghetto/dp/0674008308 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That is totally believable, and it made sense when the minority voting base was smaller and white ppl were more hostile. As diversity becomes more mainstream as required by demographics, newer minority politicians will be more open to broader coalitions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ersatzverite @J_RtheWriter and
Although there is a terrible alternative that I worry about, where the definition of "white" keeps on expanding until the only non "white" people are black people.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ersatzverite @J_RtheWriter and
Which is what happened with Italians, Jews, Irish people etc. Originally not "white," then demographics changed, became "white" to preserve the "white" majority.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That’s the 200+ year history of the United States. Why would I expect it to suddenly change
-
-
Progress is almost always incremental.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The exceptions are during wars and depressions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.