I have also noticed that a certain extremely male 'Ladies Really Need to Be Having Lots More Babies' crowd has been strangely silent on the issue of pregnancy discrimination. Right when their pet issue is suddenly a big part of the conversation! Interesting. Very interesting.
-
-
-
Replying to @JohnCarltonKing @MadelineOnMars
Look at the thread I linked to in a retweet. He’s disgusting, never knew this side of him b4
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @RobbenKeith @MadelineOnMars
Matt Bruenig is a horrible person.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @JohnCarltonKing @RobbenKeith
And then there’s Lyman, who was going on about what he calls the 'fertility gap' and the wage gap, simultaneously, *right* as thousands of women were talking about getting fired or not hired or mocked at work for getting pregnant. But women are lazy! That must be it!pic.twitter.com/eJKK2iGWeH
5 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
Pretty sure that he’s saying the exact opposite. And arguing that policy failures lead to people having less kids than they might want is hardly akin to what you describe above. Why even make these comments if you’re going to be this inaccurate?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
