That’s probably not a felony. Likely, the president has ultimate authority over what constitutes an official weather report Just like presidents can’t be guilty of disclosing classified information bc the president decides how things get classified
-
-
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @kstreethipster
Maybe? I think there's a reasonable logic behind giving the president final authority to declassify things while not giving him final authority on weather reports. They are really, really different things
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The law was written with the idea that the President would exercise judgment about declassifying things with an eye towards the public benefit (balancing the needs of diplomacy, security, and public dialogue) rather than grift, personal pettiness, or recklessness.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think it’s more basic than that. The authority to classify belongs to the president and is exercised through his designates. I imagine (but don’t know) that most functions of the executive work the same way
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's plausible to me that a competent president might face a situation where he knows the right thing to do is to declassify something; he has the whole picture. It's not plausible to me that there is a situation in which the right thing to do is to change a weather forecast
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @vikrambath1 @kstreethipster and
Similarly, I don't think he should be able to, for example, say that the census actually found 300 million people live in Alabama and that's how elections will be determined from now on because he's the president and has ultimate say so
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
The particulars are going to lie in the relevant legislation. Lots of authorities vested in the executive are explicitly given to “the president and his designates.” But often Congress directs the executive to follow certain guidelines, which I imagine is the case with the census
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
By the way, I fully support Congress retaking it’s rightful place and restraining executive authority, but that seems to be something people are for or against in line with whether their guy is in office or not
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.