I’d call it life. People are born with talents and advantages. There’s nothing thing fair about that. It just is
-
-
Replying to @kstreethipster
Innate ability and skill has nothing to do with fairness, so how could anything that flows from it? Games have rules and if you want to argue that we often violate the rules for the advantage of certain people, then yes we do. You’re right about that
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster
1/ Because it’s complicated. And I’m not trying to be purposefully obtuse. Here’s an example: rich connected kids have an easier time getting into elite schools for two sets of reasons
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @kstreethipster
2/ the first set of reasons is all those back doors and front doors built into the institutions that explicitly privilege rich kids
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @kstreethipster
3/ but there’s a whole other set of reasons that full under a different category. And that’s that the whole game of “getting into an elite school” was set up with rules that explicitly favor the rich in the same way that basketball explicitly favors the tall
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, that’s not it. My point is that no pure meritocracy will ever be fair. And any fair system will have to do more than just maximize “merit.” We have to make a choice. Even sports has rules that limits the players ability to physically dominate each other
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.