It’s storytelling. It’s not science
It’s not about scary or not scary. It’s about probable scenarios. And Wallace-Wells chose the worst, which also happen to be the least probable. Which is fine, but that’s storytelling, not science
-
-
You did say that the catastrophizing is supported by research. It is. But the exact same research yields a whole bunch of other scenarios as well. And most of those non-catastrophic scenarios are more likely
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.