She’s the one telling her supporters NOT to dismiss these people. Would you rather she not have asked them that? Jesus you cannot have it both ways.
-
-
Replying to @kstreethipster @J_RtheWriter and
If you were ambivalently supporting a racist because you were misguided or temporarily uninformed, would you not want to be reached and persuaded? Would’nt you want the other candidate to give a shit about you and say we need to reach out to you and NOT give up?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
Having it both ways was the whole point of my original comment. Trump is president because he manages to be explicitly white supremacist but make his followers believe that they are anything but. We’re Americans. We like to live in denial.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @kstreethipster and
HRC and the Democrats have been pitching a different form of denial and it just hasn’t been as persuasive to a whole bunch of Americans. And believe me, I wish that this wasn’t the case
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
Denial of what, exactly? Do you just mean a general skepticism that Trump bootlickers won’t vote for us? Because to me that seems perfectly rational.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
No. That’s not what I meant. My one big problem with HRC’s campaign is that she tried to run a sort of populist-lite campaign, which was completely ineffective against Trump.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @kstreethipster and
Another example was HRC supporters claiming that there was no reason to support Sanders bc HRC wanted all the same policies but was pragmatic enough to get them done. That’s obvious BS. Most people see right through it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
How is that not just normal “compare/contrast” campaigning? She was able to say she was the one with leadership experience and he had spent decades getting no bills passed languishing in legislative irrelevance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
Because she’s obviously as not as far to the left as Sanders. Why even dispute that and try to convince people otherwise. No one buys it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
I agree it was a mistake and it’s also the wrong policy position outside of political strategy. I’m just not convinced it’s an attempt at populism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It was an attempt at trying to counter Trump by offering a milder version of his nationalism. And almost nobody wants that.
-
-
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
I don’t think it had anything to do with Trump because she changed her position on it during the primary not during the general.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.