You really don’t see how patronizing that is?
-
-
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
She’s the one telling her supporters NOT to dismiss these people. Would you rather she not have asked them that? Jesus you cannot have it both ways.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @J_RtheWriter and
If you were ambivalently supporting a racist because you were misguided or temporarily uninformed, would you not want to be reached and persuaded? Would’nt you want the other candidate to give a shit about you and say we need to reach out to you and NOT give up?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
Having it both ways was the whole point of my original comment. Trump is president because he manages to be explicitly white supremacist but make his followers believe that they are anything but. We’re Americans. We like to live in denial.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @kstreethipster and
HRC and the Democrats have been pitching a different form of denial and it just hasn’t been as persuasive to a whole bunch of Americans. And believe me, I wish that this wasn’t the case
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
Denial of what, exactly? Do you just mean a general skepticism that Trump bootlickers won’t vote for us? Because to me that seems perfectly rational.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
No. That’s not what I meant. My one big problem with HRC’s campaign is that she tried to run a sort of populist-lite campaign, which was completely ineffective against Trump.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
From my perspective she isn’t a populist & didn’t run a campaign like that. I thought it looked like a traditional “Al gore”style campaign emphasizing aisle-crossing and bipartisanship & inclusiveness of a diverse array of Americans. It was ultra-carful, as in: try not to lose.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
I watched her in the first debate, stand next to Trump and attempt some version of ‘I’m against bad trade deals, too.’ Trump had already staked out the nationalist/populist lane. Why try to beer towards it. It made no political sense
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
I think opposition to international trade deals is more nationalist than populist. I wish she had not changed her position on TPP. I think she was drawn there by Sanders during the primaries.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That’s my whole point. Trying to be all things to all people is an ineffective political strategy. And that’s the problem the Dems have.
-
-
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
I think it’s a good problem to have because we want to represent everyone and not just the people who look like us or the people who come from the same economic class or the same geography
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.