Spot on. Whether meant that way or not, the 'perception' to a great many was that she had accused almost 25% of the national population of being horrible people. Clearly not the case. Many responded w/ defiance and entrenchment.
-
-
-
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
Do I really need to go through the polling data to show you that near or more than a quarter of the country espouse objectively racist, sexist, and ESPECIALLY anti-Muslim ideas? Starting with this?pic.twitter.com/h9bwTIMvQq
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
How about this?pic.twitter.com/3quXx1XKtS
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
Gallup did a poll showing that only 45% of republicans would ever vote for a Muslim president. Only 61% would vote for a gay or lesbian president.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
1/ That exactly why I said that Republicans have an exclusionary vision but they’ll take anyone who doesn’t push back on that vision. Black women aren’t a big demo for the Trump crowd but Diamond and Silk have a million followers.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
You believe democrats *won’t* take anyone who doesn’t push back on their vision? (Diamond & Silk are grifters and their fans are white.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @VBaker111 and
Of course the Dem platform is more inclusive and Diamond and Silk exist to comfort white Trump supporters into believing that they’re not racists. That’s entirely my point. Trump has made the bar very low, which is how someone with no business in the race got >40 million votes
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @J_RtheWriter @VBaker111 and
But I thought you were saying democrats were not inclusive in their messaging and republicans were. As in they would “take” anyone who didn’t disagree and we somehow wouldn’t?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kstreethipster @J_RtheWriter and
You specifically said Clinton was exclusionary. Exclusionary to whom? In my view she was far more inclusive.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
To all the people who didn’t vote for her, specifically the ones in the swing states. And my whole point is that your view isn’t what matters in a national election. As a NYer, mine doesn’t either
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.