We shouldn’t even be putting these two men in the same category and this set up legitimizes the writing of someone who has not done the scholarship.https://twitter.com/GuardianUS/status/1141455776902451201 …
-
His arguments are based on his ignorance of historical truths.
What historical truths did he deny? He said he’s in favor of paying reputations to people who survived slavery and/or Jim Crow. His only disagreement is about extending that to descendants. Maybe that’s the wrong opinion, but there’s no fallacy there
-
-
The fallacy is that the descendants don't suffer the effects of both. Or that Jim Crow is not an extension of slavery. Or that the present is not an extension of the past. If he studied, he would know exactly how oppression has extended it's hand into the present
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.