We shouldn’t even be putting these two men in the same category and this set up legitimizes the writing of someone who has not done the scholarship.https://twitter.com/GuardianUS/status/1141455776902451201 …
Their disagreement has almost nothing to do with scholarship or lack of scholarship. It’s a difference of opinion on what effect reparations would have in the future. Maybe Hughes’ opinion is wrong, but it’s not something that can really be addressed through more research
-
-
That’s ridiculous on its face. Valid opinions on issues of history and of national importance REQUIRE research and knowledge. What are you talking about?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ignorance is the reason fallacies reign. You shouldn’t be invited to the debate table if you are not armed.
-
What fallacy did Hughes bring to the the table?
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Right, this isn’t a scientific or technical question. We aren’t determining the best way to re-visit the moon.
-
That was just dumb. Like, seriously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
It has every thing to do with scholarship: it is the difference between a layman’s opinion and that of a learned, well researched, published, professional one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.