Now I feel that, sure, but when I was a Republican, I felt totally un-conflicted. I was an economic conservative, and I firmly believed that mattered way more than the social stuff. It never felt like a piece of my soul. It felt like round-off error on stuff that didn't matter
Of the 3 places I’ve lived in the US (NYC, DC, and AK) it was only possible for me to legally buy and keep a gun in 1. I guess I could go to a state with less regulation and buy one, but it would be illegal as soon as I got home. That right there falsifies Obama’s statement
-
-
Sure, but in AK you could have 47 of them. But, seriously, DC and NYC are huge outliers. That's not true in the rest of NY state is it? I know it's not true where I live in CA, and I'm about as close as you can get to SF without being there.
-
The claim made was a gun. I'm not seeing anything which prevents an individual from having a gun, barring a legal reason. Can somebody point me to the specific law that prevents an individual from owning a gun in either DC or NYC?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Unless there is something else precluding you from ownership, research suggests you can have guns in DC and NYC.
-
Does your research include actually trying to get a permit or the difference btw shall issue or may issue? Regulations in place make it effectively impossible to get a gun permit in either of those cities, unless you’re very wealthy or politically connected (even after Heller)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It is legal to own guns in all three places. *Which* guns is a different story, and carry laws vary, but here in gun-control-central CA my brother owns several, all legally purchased.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.