Making choices does not equal having free will. If the centuries long debate in philosophy had been about whether humans make choices, that’d be a pretty boring argument.
-
Show this thread
-
Free will (libertarian free will) would entail being the prime mover (or uncaused cause) of your thoughts and actions—i.e, having the ability to have chosen otherwise. We don’t have that.
19 replies 10 retweets 139 likesShow this thread -
Your choices are, in a sense, events. They are things that happen according to the laws of physics—which (at the human scale) are deterministic. Don’t flatter yourself by presuming to be the one special substance that stands outside those laws.
28 replies 12 retweets 120 likesShow this thread -
If there’s no free will, what’s the point of getting out of bed? The Q makes no sense. Even if you stay in bed, it will have been by no free will of your own.
5 replies 7 retweets 125 likesShow this thread -
For instance, we tend to assume animals lack free will (maybe you don’t). But no one wonders why their dog gets out of bed in the morning. And no one thinks that their dog’s lack of free will means that its actions towards other dogs don’t matter.
33 replies 16 retweets 166 likesShow this thread
I take my cues from the phenomenologists. Existence precedes essence. Free will exists. Just because it is mostly an emergent phenomenon, doesn’t make it any less real
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.