From the beginning, there are have been skeptics of the impact-investing approach to social change. Can the architects and operators of the winners-take-all world really be the key to solving inequality? But impact investors promised us: Yes, they could.https://www.wsj.com/articles/u2s-bono-and-tpg-launch-company-to-measure-impact-investments-11548227512 …
-
Show this thread
-
And now one of the absolute deans of the doing-well-by-doing-good industrial complex -- a man who embodied the faith that the meek of the earth could be saved by private-equity barons -- has been indicted for rigging the opportunity structure against the disadvantaged.
18 replies 928 retweets 3,654 likesShow this thread -
When
@SimonWSJ called me about TPG and Bono in January, I said: "What Bono is doing is legitimizing the idea that the best way to solve the world’s problems is in ways that don’t threaten the powerful, that allow them to stay on top, avoid paying taxes and give a little back."18 replies 767 retweets 3,800 likesShow this thread -
This story brings it home. And more than the celebrities, for me it is Bill. Bill McGlashan, who epitomizes the modern fantasy that the rich people who rigged the modern world, who monopolized the American dream for themselves, are the solution to redressing our injustices.
17 replies 997 retweets 4,201 likesShow this thread -
What is alleged in this scheme is that someone who claimed to be working to change the system, change capitalism, empower others, help others "rise," was working downstream to lock others out of a slot they perhaps deserved but that would instead go to their kid.
18 replies 716 retweets 3,350 likesShow this thread -
And I know the Bill McGlashans of this world. I reported on them. I argue with them now. They email me. They DM me. And they explain that I don't get it. I'm too negative. They are solving real problems. I'm just writing about things. And here the mask slips, and we see.
23 replies 443 retweets 3,292 likesShow this thread -
Elite do-gooders like Bill McGlashan sometimes do real good. They help communities and even save lives. But so much of what they do follows one overpowering rule: They are willing to help in ways that allow them to stay on top and lock others out. This story must be remembered.
30 replies 1,320 retweets 5,386 likesShow this thread -
At a conference for
@TheEconomist recently, I called for a moratorium on impact investing until finance unwinds its own complicity in the injustices it purportedly wants to help solve. I redouble that call now. This should be a signal moment for#ImpInv to reflect and regroup.18 replies 448 retweets 2,675 likesShow this thread -
Don't tell yourself this man is a one-off. He is a perfect metaphor for an
#ImpInv industry that wants the reputational benefits of "changing the world" while clinging to the systems of oppression that continue to cause the problems you supposedly are devoted to solving.21 replies 475 retweets 2,725 likesShow this thread -
And, by the way, before you even say it: Don't "Not all impact investors" me. I'm not interested in "Not all men" or "Not all white people," either. This is a conversation about systems. Understand how you belong to them.
92 replies 620 retweets 5,275 likesShow this thread
This makes no sense. Would you ever argue that government is a bad way to help people, because some politicians and bureaucrats are corrupt? Why pretend to be making an objective argument when you just don't like finance?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.