Any definition of class structure that allows some people to be ‘outside’ of it is a bad & ahistorical onehttps://twitter.com/nhannahjones/status/1102545500065153024 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @AMWolfinger
Except when those people were not classified as people.
5 replies 5 retweets 75 likes -
Replying to @nhannahjones
Why should the racist justifications of the time determine our definitions now?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AMWolfinger
Because the residue of that impacts us today and any discussions of racial injustice and class politics.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @nhannahjones
You said enslaved people were outside the class structure of society b/c people justified this by calling them subhuman at the time. Correct?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AMWolfinger @nhannahjones
Looking back, knowing what we know now, wouldn’t we consider them part of that society regardless of what racists of the time said?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AMWolfinger
That's not my argument. These are my ancestors. Clearly, I understand they were humans and laborers. But I am explaining why black people face disadvantage across the spectrum regardless of class and that is because black people's primary disadvantage is caste, which is immutable
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nhannahjones @AMWolfinger
Categorizing enslaved people as property, as real estate, as a commodity, necessarily meant they were not on the level of laboring white people, no matter how poor those white people were. They were an untouchable caste and so normal class dynamics did not and do not apply.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
The best thing about that first Tweet is that "historical" is meant to refer to a particular Marxist interpretation of history and not to actual historical events as they happened in the US
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.