wut? is? going? on?
-
-
OK, freakout over? Ready to keep going? Because we're not done yet. While the "liberal prof gives F to conservative student" theory is a myth, this isn't to say that partisanship doesn't have any effect on grading. It does. Just not in the way you might think.
1 reply 23 retweets 304 likesShow this thread -
One fascinating paper (Bar and Zussman 2012) finds that Democratic profs are more "egalitarian" in their grading while Republican profs award more grades at the higher/lower extremes. Republicans also systematically give lower grades to black students. https://talia-bar.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1683/2016/03/Bar2012_AEJ_Applied.pdf …pic.twitter.com/pAFIy3QA4w
4 replies 250 retweets 769 likesShow this thread -
Note that there are many possible explanations for the racial disparity besides discrimination (whether "positive" in the case of Dems or "negative" in the case of Reps). And note also that BOTH kinds of profs systematically give black students lower grades. Dems just do it less.
2 replies 56 retweets 383 likesShow this thread -
But it's not due to differences in student ability. That again gets controlled for via SAT score matching. (The report finds little partisan difference in grading for female vs. male students)
6 replies 12 retweets 242 likesShow this thread -
OKAY. What's the tl;dr of it all? First, to the liberals in the audience: I bet you're feeling pretty smug about now, right? Well, stop it. Yes, the conservatives-are-penalized theory is a myth, but that doesn't mean they don't face other challenges on campus.
1 reply 23 retweets 271 likesShow this thread -
As I said at the top of the thread, they are more likely than libs to self-censor. They are also less likely to be invited to socialize with profs out of class or be asked to collaborate on research projects. Lots of other ways. It can be rough out there. Faculty must do better.
13 replies 14 retweets 258 likesShow this thread -
Now to the conservatives in the audience: You probably think I'm some kind of leftwing hack. You're right! But I also tried to be as fair and transparent in this thread as possible, supplying you with all the citations and ungated sources.
1 reply 8 retweets 315 likesShow this thread -
One response you might have: If there's no evidence of anti-con grading bias, it's only because cons have by necessity gotten really good at parroting back to liberal profs whatever they want to hear. Checkmate, Sachs!
1 reply 5 retweets 188 likesShow this thread -
I don't think so. The overwhelming majority of cons feel comfortable expressing themselves in class (78%), though this is lower than the percentage of liberals (89%). And most reasons given for self-censorship have nothing to do with the prof. FIRE survey, Tables 9 and 13.pic.twitter.com/imw3nN0lKa
3 replies 15 retweets 225 likesShow this thread
How is this an answer to the criticism that you just brought up? The Kemmelmeier, et. al. paper simply doesn't test the hypothesis you claim it does. Showing some data about willingness to express political views in class doesn't change that fact
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.