I put this in a trollish way that misrepresents my own considered view, but it's fascinating to consider why it *feels* so dangerous to clearly state that, given what we know now, Trump is likely to lose to generic D challenger in 2020. People are scared that saying it jinxes it.https://twitter.com/willwilkinson/status/1095178955609591808 …
-
-
Replying to @willwilkinson
You changed "is going to get crushed" to "likely to lose". That's an enormous change.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @takethepith
Well, I think he's likely to get crushed. But people read me as saying that there's no chance he wins, which is not something I'd ever say. I think he had a 33% chance in 2016 and a 25% chance now, and he's president now and could be again, but it's *more* likely he's crushed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @willwilkinson @takethepith
In the current equilibrium, ~40% of the electorate would vote for a ham sandwich if it had D or R behind its name, so that keeps the odds closer than many want to admit
2:05 PM - 12 Feb 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.