That’s not a critique of Biden, but we have to recognize where we are and what’s happening. People were telling me in 2016 there was no way Trump could win because there weren’t enough yard signs while he was receiving billions in free media coverage.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Bloomberg’s giant failure of a campaign is going to be a case study in this. His numbers soared with all the ads, yanked when he cratered on the debate stage. Media has always played a role, but it’s completely taken over the political process.
Show this thread -
The media isn’t just covering what’s happening, it’s constantly changing what’s happening, molding, inspiring what’s happening. People like to believe they’re not moved by outside forces, but that relationship is extraordinarily prevalent and denying it doesn’t make it less so.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And fear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Maybe some voters just liked him best?
-
Highly doubtful
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah except for if that was true, at least the media I watch, Bernie Sanders would be winning hands down. Of course I knew that to a huge part of this country his ideology is not what they want at all
-
Chapter 2 is If you go down my Twitter feed what you see is a bunch of red rose types really angry and convinced that somehow the GOP voted biden in.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No organization, no ads, and yet voters came out and supported their candidate in big numbers. It's the GOP model from 2016, except Biden has experience, integrity and character vs insults and a reality TV facade.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.