unsourced graphs? not wasting my time...
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @StephenLeahy @FionnRodgers i sljedećem broju korisnika:
It says All 1,218 USHCN stations. There’s the source.pic.twitter.com/QoomY8mWP7
Ovo je potencijalno osjetljiv multimedijski sadržaj. Saznajte više
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @realPitBullDog @FionnRodgers i sljedećem broju korisnika:
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @StephenLeahy @realPitBullDog i sljedećem broju korisnika:
That graph is complete garbage. NOAA now counts mild winter nights and mild winter days as being "extreme weather events" I have blogged about this fraud numerous times.
5 replies 23 proslijeđena tweeta 98 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Tony__Heller @StephenLeahy i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Less hot days and milder winter nights are a good thing... A mild winter night never harmed anyone
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @realPitBullDog @StephenLeahy i sljedećem broju korisnika:
NOAA also uses their fake adjusted data to calculate the number of hot days in the climate extremes index. Their abuse of the public trust is stunning.
29 proslijeđenih tweetova 72 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Tony__Heller @BulldogLoyalty i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Wirbelwind 🌍 🇪🇺 🇩🇪 je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceMet Office
From United Kingdom's national weather service... It's a
#ClimateCrisishttps://twitter.com/metoffice/status/1208031803287539712?s=20 …Wirbelwind 🌍 🇪🇺 🇩🇪 je dodan/na,
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Wirbelwind_ @Tony__Heller i sljedećem broju korisnika:
THE very fact that the
#MetUK added GretaThunberg
into the tweet proves their activist position to the #ClimateChangeHoax over real, objective science.1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @JWSpry @Tony__Heller i sljedećem broju korisnika:
They did objective science and factual communications for 40 years. Nobody listened. Now they see the dramatically results of their actual work. What do you expect them to do? Lean back and enjoy the show? Try again the same, boring kind of communication for another decade?
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Wirbelwind_ @JWSpry i sljedećem broju korisnika:
In the days of 'objective' budget seeking science, climatologists predicted the Maldives would be under water by 2000 CE. Actually, they've grown. Real observational scientists change their predictions when the evidence fails to meet the models.
6 proslijeđenih tweetova 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
JWSpry 🇦🇶 je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceJWSpry 🇦🇶
A bit like #PolarBears. Except the cult has dumped them now, in favour of Child Soldiers and penguins.
https://t.co/ce7WwNw7Eq https://twitter.com/jwspry/status/1224272785842700289?s=21 …
JWSpry 🇦🇶 je dodan/na,
agenda on life-support, becoming more hysterical by the day, under constant siege by inconvenient scientific data & a litany of failed predictions.”
https://climatism.blog/2020/02/03/polar-bears-the-new-symbol-of-climate-change-realism-and-a-stable-arctic/ …
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.