See, this is why I would never put my entire career at the mercy of @TeamYouTube like many youtubers do. It’s because their policies don’t really mean anything. If they don’t like you, they’ll demonitize you and legally there’s nothing you can do about it.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Hate speech is not protected under the first amendment.
42 replies 0 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @ILikeBonhoeffer @RobBowlinThe3rd and
Yes it is. Hate speech literally means nothing
3 replies 0 retweets 135 likes -
Replying to @Majaffey @ILikeBonhoeffer and
That is true, but his monetization is not protected. You can disagree with YT and their lack of a coherent policy, yet what they are doing is within their right.
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @xilefheinzel @Majaffey and
Not really. By law they have to be either a platform or a publisher, they can't be both. Right now they are marketing themselves as a platform, but if they decide to be a publisher instead, that means they are legally responsible for everything that goes up on their site.
6 replies 3 retweets 53 likes -
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @xilefheinzel and
Well, if they're legally a platform, then they do have to uphold free speech. If they're a publisher, then they don't. They need to clearly make this distinction.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @xilefheinzel and
Not in the First Amendment, but in the laws passed by CONGRESS.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
As I said in the original tweet, 'by LAW', not 'by the CONSTITUTION'.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.