What do you/they mean doesn’t have? There’s plenty of them. ghcide, hie, leksah, ghcid, and plenty of other editor integration tools with a bunch of different features. What are the features people are missing?
I mute everyone that complains about haskell having no IDE. I got tired of the dumb circlejerk. You don't need one. If you are hellbent on complaining about not having one, I definitely don't want to read what you have to say.
-
-
-
I'm not naming and shaming but there's many a tweet every single week about it and it's so annoying. Moreover ghci itself (with cabal v2) is pretty great. Hardly need anything else aside from syntax highlighting.
- Još 6 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
What is "need"? Obviously it's possible to edit GHC without one. But it takes 45 minutes to download source for dependencies and generate TAGS files for my code at work. If working with a large new codebase, these navigation tools speed learning prior art up a ton.
-
Lacking an IDE is not an obstacle to learn a language, but makes navigating any non trivial project an order of magnitude better
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Meanwhile, in another Galaxyhttps://twitter.com/isaac_abraham/status/1221142550561611776?s=09 …
-
F# has four IDEs out there.
This was just to illustrate that you don't need them - in the dotnet world there was historically more of a reliance on IDEs, code gen and point and click to make even a simple hello world. - Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.