In other words the placebo contained no aluminum adjuvant , no viral antigens, the ingredients that the AVers say cause the problems.What's left in it is 9.56mg NaCl, H20(saline). micro amts of l-histidine an amino acid, yeast protein,50 ucg of polysorbate 80, 35 ug Na Borate.
-
-
Replying to @ailsa_graham @StaciCali707 and
The whole vax is dangerous. The kids were monitored for 30min only post vax, then relied on parents to report Adverse Events. Yet 46% of the vax & 44% of the placebo still had systemic AE. In other words, you've checked rxlist but havent read the study.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @resQnance @StaciCali707 and
What do you think systemic AE is? Serious systemic events due to the vaccine was 0. They were headache, fever,sore throat. These symptoms happen after vaccination indicating that your body is having an immune response and is normal. Vague enough to be unrelated to the vaccine.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ailsa_graham @StaciCali707 and
0 based on 30min of monitoring following administration, by Merck's own clinical investigators. How objectively scientific. Yet, the "placebo" you said was only salt water caused 44% of subjects to have adverse events. Please, elucidate me on how only 9.56mg of NaCl causes these.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @resQnance @StaciCali707 and
Not 30 minutes 15 days. Look at Table 5. AS I said vague symptoms that could be attributed to other events, such as colds, placebo effect. Other AE were significantly less in the placebo
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ailsa_graham @StaciCali707 and
15 days, reported by the parent. Are you suggesting the parents received a crash course on the acute symptoms of an adverse event? Meanwhile, only 'serious adverse experiences that were considered by the [MERCK] investigator to be vaccine-related were to be reported.' "Science".
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @resQnance @StaciCali707 and
Parents reported symptoms. They don't have to know what they are caused by . Are you telling me that the parents of these kids wouldn't recognize serious illness in their children. Unless the acute symptoms of an adverse event are unnoticeable?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ailsa_graham @StaciCali707 and
Yeah ok. cool story. We will never know since Merck's employees determined what reports were caused by the dose. I'm still waiting for your explanation on how 0.5mL of solution, that according to you is basically salt water, can cause similar adverse events? I'm all buckled in.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @resQnance @ailsa_graham and
The point is that it didn’t cause adverse event. Give 10,000 a penny, follow them for a couple years and some bad things will happen to some of them. Thus, adverse reactions to a penny are created.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @JHowardBrainMD @ailsa_graham and
Well that assertion would require a long term vax vs inert placebo study or vax vs nothing study, wouldn't it? I note that your speculative blather is not supported by any evidence whatsoever. Good job, "doctor".
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Wrong. Done wasting my time. Muted.pic.twitter.com/7JqmOgIW7O
-
-
Replying to @JHowardBrainMD @ailsa_graham and
Thats because within 5 comments it becomes readily apparent your ideological tenets are based on belief, not science. You're title doesnt command respect, it must continously be earnt with genuine integrity instead of the masquerade of integrity on show.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.