Worse, the structure and tone of the article are more that of a celebrity profile, specifically that of a controversial celebrity. The thing is, Bigtree is not controversial. There is no scientific controversy about his antivax views. He is a dangerous crank, an antivaxer. 4/
But by all means, don’t let me stop you from yelling on Twitter.
-
-
Hi
@JFKucinich it is extremely important to note that Del did NOT brandish a 'No Vax' star. His message was one of solidarity with Orthodox Jews, using a plain gold star he made himself. He did not equate AV'ers to the Jews in Nazi Germany. Please watch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sI8jq3JAB-g&t=25s … -
What utter rot.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here is Dels friend and fellow Vaxxed group leader. They need to be designsted a hate group.https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/anti-defamation-league-jonathan-greenblatt-louis-farrakhan-islam/2019/02/22/id/903936/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When writing about cranks, the "truth sandwich" is an advantageous format. The piece from
@thedailybeast is a lie sandwichhttps://twitter.com/georgelakoff/status/1068891959882846208?lang=en …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Incorrect. That wasn’t the main point Del and his minions incorrectly whined about for months after. Also that’s simply untrue. All new vaccines for new diseases undergo double-blind randomized placebo testing during trials.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.