Conversation

None of these would improve the gun violence problem in this country. All of them satisfy the urge to "do something" without actually doing anything useful, at great cost to the rights of people who follow the law. Let's take just one example, "red flag" laws.
Quote Tweet
We need to: Ban assault weapons — and if we can’t, then we should raise the age to purchase them from 18 to 21. Ban high-capacity magazines. Strengthen background checks. Enact safe storage laws and red flag laws. Repeal gun manufacturers’ immunity from liability.
Replying to
So all of us agree that we don't want insane people to go and buy a gun and kill people. The question is how to actually accomplish that goal. Importantly, it's already a violation of federal law to sell a gun to a crazy person. So what do red flag laws do?
67
1,154
They allow the government to eliminate peoples' rights without any due process. Say your neighbor calls the police and says you're a bad guy who's about to commit a crime? Or maybe your ex complains about you after an argument? Now the cops can show up and remove your firearms.
91
1,340
Imagine this approach with any other set of rights. Imagine a neighbor complaining about someone, and then having that person thrown in jail. Or say a guy's ex-wife (think Amber Herd) claims he was abusive, and so we take away his right to free speech.
39
979
Maybe the neighbor has a point. Maybe the ex-wife is right. But we have a simple principle in this country: innocent until proven guilty. If you want to strip someone's rights, you've got to go through a court of law--that's true even with those rights progressives don't like.
24
1,039
There's another angle to this: we're ignoring that it's already against the law to provide or sell a weapon to a crazy person. Why do so many people, from the shooters in Uvalde and Parkland to many others, get guns when there were many signs that they were a problem?
28
915
The answer (in part) goes to how we treat mental health and institutionalization. Walk around any big city in America these days and you have a very good chance of meeting an obviously insane person who is a threat to themselves and others. As a society, we ignore them.
28
1,010
But whether they're an isolated teen in Texas or a screaming insane person outside of the New York subway, we need to ignore less and institutionalize more. Is that a strong response? Sure is, which is why we have due process before we commit anyone to a mental institution.
32
968
Yet we need to be willing to institutionalize people more, both to clean up our streets and also to help some obviously very sick people. That would be far more effective than any "red flag" law. And we'd respect important rights in the process.
171
1,553
There's so much more to do. American schools are clearly seen as soft targets by evil people. Is this sad? Yes. Do I wish it weren't so? Of course. But it's reality. So, we need to bolster school security and make it harder to get into schools in the first place.
54
1,019
I've not even addressed the deeper problems here. We have some very troubled young men who carry out these mass shootings. We have horrible inner-city gun violence that kills far more people than any of the one-off shootings that gather headlines.
31
944
We have a deranged media that covers the mass murders that fit their narrative while ignoring those that don't (do a search for "Tulsa" and "Waukesha" to see what I mean). And one of our deepest problems is politicians who use slogans that poll well instead of being honest.
52
1,837
If you want to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill--and you should--there is a solution out there that 1) doesn't harm lawful citizens; 2) would actually address the severe mental health crisis in this country; and 3) might actually work. Joe Biden should start there.
146
1,448