Conversation

Replying to
The claim that releasing virtual images of the routers to secured, certified professional forensic auditors would put law enforcement lives in danger is a bald-faced like. It is lunacy prima facie. They hope we're as stupid as they think we are. That's all there is to it.
7
91
No lives would be put in danger by letting limited professional forensic auditors examine routers. Period. What is on the routers that has them making up such blatant, mind-numbingly stupid lies? You all know the answer whether you admit it or not. This is a smoking gun.
2
101
It's been said before and it must be said again for the sake of reluctant Democrats and RINOs currently in denial. IF the election wasn't flat-out stolen, they would not be committing every iota of energy they can muster to stop the audits. They should WANT the audits.
9
124
Democrats and globalists have been accused of a crime. Accused people do not bleed from their eyeballs attempting to block the one thing that can exonerate them. They only try to block the evidence that proves they are criminals. Conclusion: They are guilty and they know it.
11
125
Show replies
Replying to
Why would they need access to the routers? If the paper ballot is a receipt and proof of actual votes and those paper ballot numbers in a recount are virtually the same as the number the machine had there is no fraud. It doesn’t matter if anyone accessed the router
3
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies