@JAMyerson You're also not advocating Soviet-style land seizure, best I can tell.
The only reason landlords "own" land they "purchased" is that big government recognizes the ownership & purchase, backs both up with guns.
-
-
-
@AlexParkerDC Agriculture not my area of expertise, but agribusiness may have to be dispossessed some. In cities, tho, LVTs ought to do.0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
-
-
@AlexParkerDC Probably so, but I think the violence oozing through my @ mentions is probably more particularly a right thing.0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
@JAMyerson But! Force initiation is ok if it's to coerce people into conforming to the social engineering scheme of private property, right?0 retweets 1 like -
@JAMyerson so a legal infrastructure for society boils down to who has the guns? How does this apply to private property?0 retweets 0 likes -
-
@JAMyerson Before we had that system, we had the alternative...prop. ownership based on who had most guns and could keep others away.0 retweets 0 likes -
@JAMyerson@tomgara Sure, but that property right is so important the Constitution has a takings and two due process clauses to protect it.0 retweets 0 likes -
@JAMyerson@UPPastryPlate "Property is theft." - Proudhon "...backed up by a gun." - me0 retweets 0 likes -
@JAMyerson why else would owners spend so much lobbying? also, good to see this point being made more frequently of late0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Jesse A. Myerson
Alex Parker
Tomm Sciortino
Eric Stinton
PastryPlate
Tom Woodfin
Roman
Luke Rebecchi