Something can be ontologically fundamental without being physically fundamental, because you don't need to use a physical reductionism.
-
-
Replying to @InstanceOfClass
@InstanceOfClass I don't believe in physicalism, but I think the "because" should be an "if" so that your philosophy can be more inclusive.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @calcnerd256
@calcnerd256 I make bold claims, thereby controlling which parts of the universe I appear in.
7:39 AM - 17 May 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.