I knew about it being true for small angles only, but I just realized that I don’t know why. Is it related to the ratio of the mass of the weight to the mass of the rod or string?
-
-
-
it's because the small angle approximation neglects the higher order terms in the initial angle θ
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Here's an easy way to understand why the period diverges as the angle increases: just imagine dropping the pendulum from an almost vertical angle. It can take a long time for it to go down on each swing, as it almost balances at every high point. (On top, the phase diagram.)pic.twitter.com/GYRSlCBDze
-
I'm not gonna lie, your animations were the first to get me interested in animating
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
does this completely match with the small angle angle approximation?
-
yup! you can see it in the smallest oscillation
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder, can this be achieved by a particular non-uniform gravitational field?
-
that's a fun question .. i would imagine so but i'm not sure
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe we should have given our 7th Leiden
#wallformula a smaller amplitude
. Still, ... we love it like this. @sensemolen@TEGENBEELD#Huygens https://muurformules.nl/ pic.twitter.com/bQQc6WWekJ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When teaching differential equations, I had a student invent a decent chunk of the theory of the Jacobi Elliptic functions because they were dissatisfied with the small angle approximation

-
Husband Physics Professor in a small college says he specifically does NOT teach that!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.