I always found this principle a bit "strange". Is it about physics or about math? It looks to me like a funny way to write equations in, say, another form, very useful, but I am not sure about its "fundamentality" from the physics point of view.
-
-
-
i would argue that there's no more fundamental principle. it's one of those things that has remained true from classical mechanics all the way down to quantum field theory
- 16 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's called that but strictly speaking it's not least but stationary? I could approximate stationary...
-
both are good advice in this case
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please tell me I don't have to use calculus of variations on myself...
-
no, variation is VERY BAD
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Seems to be working for the president
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But how does nature know, before event happens, that which trajectory is having stationary action? I mean, it doesn't run simulations to find out best trajectory,it just happen to know before the event even starts. I apologize if you find this question stupid,I am just curious.
-
I'd say nature tries to balance all acting forces, leading to tiny movement, and then balances them again leading to a trajectory... it evolves in infinitesimal steps, very much like timestepping with discrete finite timesteps works in numerics... It gets philosophical easily :)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.