Physics friends, can I have some advice for intro to GR textbooks and pre-reqs? Would General Relativity from A to B followed by either Schutz or Hartle be good for self study? I don't know much about: EM, tensor algebra/calc, diff geom. Should I study any of these first?
-
-
Oh no, I don't drink
-
Then Carroll is a good substitute, highly recommended. Hartle is a nice intro read and iirc keeps discussing geometry relatively long before introducing Einstein eqs. and solutions. I recall Carroll going into much more technical details and formalism, but it's been a few years.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I have the book
@InertialObservr is talking about but it’s the first version that was published in 2003. A newer version came out late in 2019. Idk how different they are or if it’s significant. I got a few more if you’ll bear with me@AndrewM_Webb.pic.twitter.com/vLeScQhi9O
-
@AndrewM_Webb: These 2 are short + light on the math. They explain the philosophy & physical concepts really well. Try these before going straight to the math-heavy stuff, you wanna learn the concepts first. The math is a huge pain in the ass that can make GR harder to understandpic.twitter.com/WuHg3SGi6Y
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Both his book and the online lecture notes are superb!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.