Two big things people are missing: how exponential growth works, and that there's a 2 week lag between any action taken to reduce the spread of the virus and any effect in terms of measured positive cases
-
yea i feel like the "infection" curves are a better approximation of the "# of available tests" vs time than the "true" # infections vs time
-
-
It's being reported with alarming frequency that cases are suddenly appearing , not that more tests are revealing more people who already had the condition
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Another interesting question: how many tests *should* there be? Obviously the answer everyone would want is N=All, but I suppose what was the lower bound of the number of tests to give us some confidence around the number of confirmed cases?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.