Interesting Q someone asked: quantum electrodynamics has an obvious classical theory it corresponds to, but quantum chromodynamics and electroweak theory don’t—why’s that? Possible answer: there’s electromagnetism in daily life, but no strong or electroweak force
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @litgenstein
There definitely is a classical Lagrangian for those theories. It’s just that quantum effects are very important in the presence of confinement and SSB, not so much when everything’s perturbative.
2 replies 2 retweets 47 likes -
Replying to @seanmcarroll
Good stuff! Do you think the classical lagrangian is unique? Or that it depends on how you take the classical limit?
3 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @litgenstein @seanmcarroll
I think what Sean is saying is that the Classical theory *is* the QCD lagrangian at tree level
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
"Tree level" as in "to forget the forest?" Or is "tree" another term of art?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It’s a very very technical term heh, free level Feynman diagrams are the leading order terms in perturbation theory
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
FREE DIAGRAMS
-
-
!!!!!
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.