Four years after taking a thermo course and I finally understand what the hell the partial derivative notation in thermodynamics means I think
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @knighton_bob
i asked early on .. it just means to hold the subscripts constant .. but isn't that what a partial derivative means anyways? it's kind of an over-clarification that makes it somewhat confusing tho i understand why they do it
6 replies 1 retweet 44 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @knighton_bob
The notation for partial derivatives is actually ambiguous. Yes, it implies that all the other variables are held constant, but what ARE the other variables? Consider f(x,y)=(x+y)²; what is ∂f/∂x? It depends, are you holding y constant or z=x+y constant?
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @arek_fu @knighton_bob
why would you hold x+y constant? once you define f(x,y) then ∂f/∂x is unambiguous
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @knighton_bob
But this is exactly what we DON'T do in thermodynamics! Do you distinguish between S(E,V), S(E,P), S(T,V)...? It's just S.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @arek_fu @knighton_bob
When i took thermo we *always* wrote S(E,V), S(E,P), S(T,V) etc..
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @knighton_bob
That's my point. How do you know which of these functions I am referring to if I just write ∂S/∂E?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
i don't which is why i said "i understand why they do it"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.